How Will Facebook’s Organ Donor Tool Change Transplants?

Earlier this month Facebook announced a new featured that would allow individuals to share their status as an organ donor to their timelines.

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg states that this new tool was inspired by Facebook members who have used the site to solve problems creatively. The CEO hopes this new initiative will spread awareness and encourage people to register as donors.

“People are using the same social tools that they’re using just to keep in touch with people on a day-to-day basis to solve these important social issues,” said Zuckerberg. “So, we figured, okay, well, could we do anything that would help people solve other types of issues, like all of the people who need organ donations in the world? And we came up with this pretty simple thing which we’re hopeful can help out just in the same way that people have done all these other things.”

According to stats from Donate Life America, a nonprofit group partnering with the social network, there were a total of only 14,144 Organ Donors in 2011.  The evening Facebook launched their new tool, 6,000 people had enrolled through 22 state registries, including:

Colorado
Connecticut
Maine
Massachusetts
Michigan
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
Rhode Island
Wyoming

On an average day, those states see less than 400 registrations combined.

Surgeons and transplant advocates have heralded the program, calling the initiative, which allows users to share their decision to donate, a “game changer.”

More than 114,000 Americans are currently on waiting lists for transplants of kidneys, livers, hearts and other organs, according to United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS), the organization that runs the nation’s transplant system. More than 6,600 died last year waiting for an organ.

“I think it’s possible that we will see an impact over the next couple of years, where we would imagine eliminating the transplant waiting list,” Dr. Andrew Cameron, a transplant surgeon at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine who helped bring the idea to Facebook, ABC News reports.

What are your thoughts?  Do you think this new tool and coordinating promotions will continue to boost the number potential donors?  Will this help match live donors with needy recipients?  Will this assist in the controversial “patient’s wishes” dilemma?

Posted in General Medicine, Social Media | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Botswana and Human Resources for Health – Part 2

This is the follow-up blog post from Tarascon Publishing Author, Matthew Dasco, MD, MSc.  Click here to read Part 1 of the Botswana and Human Resources for Health post.

Part 2:

The “push” factors and “pull” factors that drive health care worker migration patterns have been well documented (see below, WHO, 2006).  Botswana is unique among African nations to be a net recruiter of foreign medical doctors.  In the case of many doctors I met, the main attraction of working in Botswana was better remuneration.  But in exchange for good wages and housing, they lived complicated and unpredictable lives.  As Ministry of Health employees, they could be moved hundreds of kilometers away with as little as two weeks notice.  Their jobs were often difficult – working in rural hospitals and clinics as general practitioners, they often faced medication stock-outs and supply shortages.  A night on call in the hospital would regularly include several complex adult patients (mostly suffering from complications of HIV and TB), pediatric admissions, minor trauma surgeries, and delivering babies (sometimes by Caesarian section).  How could Botswana, trained in resource-rich settings with little to no medical experience in Africa, be expected to return to practice in such an environment?

 

As my work continued in the country, I began to work more with the new University of Botswana School of Medicine and teach in its first internal medicine M.Med (residency) program.  In the first class of four, all were nationals who had been employed as medical officers (general practitioners) within the Ministry of Health.  Their education was supported in part by a Medical Education Partnership Initiative (MEPI) grant, funded jointly by Fogarty International Center/NIH and the US Health Resources and Services Organization.

In 2011 I began to take residents with me on outreach visits to rural district hospitals.  We made ward rounds and worked in the outpatient clinics together.  It was incredible to watch the nature of the doctor-patient interaction change.  I saw a level of familiarity that had never been there when I, a foreigner, rounded with expatriate medical staff (despite my meager attempts to communicate in Setswana).  Their cultural savoir-faire put patients at ease and garnered immediate trust.  Even though they were normally under the care of highly competent non-national clinicians, the first question out most patients’ mouths was, “when are you coming back to take care of us?”  I was immediately jealous, but also satisfied – this was the future of medical care in Botswana – Batswana doctors caring for their countrymen and women.

Unfortunately, statistics are not on their side.   According to the American College of Physicians, only about 20 to 25% of internal medicine residency graduates enter a career in general medicine – the rest subspecialize (ACP, 2012).  The statistics from Africa are harder to find, but a 2005 study from South Africa demonstrated about a 40% rate of specialization among medical school graduates (6% to internal medicine) – the rate of subspecialization was not studied and is not available on the College of Physicians of South Africa website (SAMJ, 2005).  Unless incentives for primary care are offered, it is reasonable to assume that the trend toward subspecialization would continue, even in the African context.  Retaining them in the public sector is another challenge entirely.
The establishment of a residency program is only the first step towards creating a cadre of well-trained national physicians.  Retention will still be an important challenge – will they be mandated to work in Botswana before considering work outside the country, or will they, like their colleagues training in the U.K. and Ireland, be allowed to migrate without restriction?  What assurances are being made that they will work in the public sector, or in primary care for that matter?  Certainly the country needs subspecialists, but primary health needs are mounting along with the demand for local, skilled specialists.

I am confident that programs like the MEPI, targeted at building educational capacity in Africa, are a step in the right direction to solving the human resources for health crisis in low- and middle-income countries.  However, the road to success in these programs is a long one and requires new data about health worker retention and barriers to careers in primary care.  Only when local doctors can articulate and manage health problems in their own words will the need for foreign health workers begin to abate.  And I know that the Batswana waiting in the clinic queue will also look forward to the day that they see one of their own sitting in the exam room waiting to care for them.

______________________________________________________________

Kerry VB, Ndung’u T, Walensky RP et al, Managing the Demand for Global Health Education, PLoS Medicine 2011, 8(11): e1001118.
World Health Organization, “Working Together for Health – the 2006 World Health Report,” WHO 2006.
Joint Learning Initiative, “Human Resources for Health: Overcoming the Crisis,” JLI 2004.
Botswana Central Statistics Office, “Botswana AIDS Impact Survey III,” CSO 2008.
American College of Physicians,Residency Match Results Not Encouraging for Adults Needing Primary Care,” ACP Newsroom, , accessed 4/27/12. 

Price M, Weiner R, Where have all the doctors gone? Career choices of Wits medical graduates, S Afr Med J  2005, 95: 414-419.

______________________________________________________________

Matthew Dacso, MD, MSc is a general internist from Houston, Texas.  He studied music at McGill University, international development at the University of London School of Oriental and African Studies, and medicine at the University of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston before completing residency at Brown University in Providence, Rhode Island.  He has worked in health care in Argentina, Peru, the Dominican Republic, Mexico, and Botswana.  His current research focuses on non-communicable diseases in HIV, traditional medicine, and global health medical education.  He continues his work in community health and development as an HIV outreach specialist for the Botswana-UPenn Partnership and is an active faculty member of the Department of Internal Medicine at the University of Botswana, both based in Gaborone, Botswana.  In 2010, he co-edited the Tarascon Global Health Pocketbook.

Posted in Authors, Global Health Blog | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Botswana and Human Resources for Health – an Ongoing Dilemma

This is the first in a two-part blog series from Tarascon Publishing Author, Matthew Dasco, MD, MSc.

Part 1:

The world’s burden of disease and human resources for health are not well aligned.  While sub-Saharan Africa has 24% of the world’s disease burden, it only has 3% of the world’s healthcare workers.  On the other end, the Americas region has 10% of the world’s disease burden but 37% of its health workers.

The Joint Learning Initiative (JLI) has calculated that the minimum number of health care workers (doctors, nurses, and midwives) in a population to achieve and 80% coverage rate of skilled birth attendance and measles vaccination is 2.5 per 1000 – countries with fewer than this number run a very high risk of not achieving the health-related millennium development goals (JLI, 2004).  57 countries in the world have been designated by the World Health Organization (WHO) as in this state of “crisis” with regards to human resources for health, which translates to a global shortage of roughly 2.4 million health workers (WHO, 2006).

(Chart from Kerry, 2011)

My first contact with the disparity between disease burden and human resources for health occurred while I was attending on the internal medicine wards at Princess Marina Hospital (PMH) in Gaborone, BotswanaPMH is the largest of two public sector tertiary care referral hospitals in the country.  In our department, there were six general medicine teams, an oncology service, and a nephrology service – each was assigned an internal medicine specialist.  The department consisted of two Cubans (a pulmonologist and a nephrologist), a Chinese generalist, an Indian generalist, a German oncologist, an Egyptian cardiologist, and a smattering of Americans working through university partnerships.  I found it odd that there were only two Batswana internal medicine specialists working there – they were among a very small number that had received specialty training abroad and returned to their home country to practice.

Continue reading

Posted in Authors, Global Health Blog | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Relationship Between Doctors, Patients & Social Media

Re-posted from our friends at Methodical Madness:
Health Care and Social Media

A recent article in Information Week stated that the health care community in the United States doesn’t take full advantage of social media as a health care tool. Most healthcare organizations in the U.S. use social media solely for marketing.

In contrast, hospitals in European countries such as the NetherlandsNorwaySweden, and the United Kingdom are embracing social media as a way to improve care management, engage patients, and communicate with other doctors.

Hospitals_social_mediaGraph courtesy of SHOULD HEALTHCARE ORGANIZATIONS USE SOCIAL MEDIA?

This is somewhat surprising considering the large number of physicans who use social media. A report on social media and physicians found that 90% of physicians use at least one social media site for personal use and 65% use at least one social media site for professional use. Moreover, 20% of clinicians use 2 or more social media sites for personal and professional use.

Physicians_social_mediaGraph courtesy of Doctors, Patients & Social Media

Many healthcare professionals see social media as a great educational resource for sharing medical knowledge and networking. In fact, there are doctor-only networks such as Sermo, Physician Connect, and Doximity. There are also public groups like TwitterDoctors.net, a database of physicians who tweet, has more than 1,300 doctors registered.

The challenges healthcare professionals face with social media are mostly centered on maintaining patient privacy and complying with industry regulations such as HIPAA where there are severe civil or criminal penalties for disclosing personal information. A report showed that of health care professionals who did not use social media, 70% cited privacy issues as the main deterrant. The American Medical Association has issued guidelines for medical students and physicians. But the social media landscapes moves so quickly, keeping current is difficult.

Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Ultrasound is More Sensitive Than Chest X-ray for Detection of a Pneumothorax


Pneumothoraces are a common problem in the ER and the ICU.  The traditional screening test for a pneumothorax in the hospital is the chest radiograph; however, chest radiographs are not very sensitive in the setting of trauma and in ventilated patients.  A recent study of 225 trauma patients demonstrated that an AP chest x-ray had only 20.9% sensitivity for detecting a pneumothorax versus a CT scan of the chest.[1] A chest CT scan is the gold standard for the diagnosis of a pneumothorax, but a CT scan is extremely expensive and exposes a patient to about 7 mSv radiation (the equivalent of 70 chest x-rays).  Another modality that is gaining traction as the principal diagnostic modality to evaluate for post-traumatic pneumothoraces is a transthoracic ultrasound.  Thoracic ultrasound look for the presence or absence of lung sliding, comet tail artifacts, A line, a lung point, and a “Seashore sign” or “Bar code sign” on M Mode sonography to determine whether a pneumothorax is present.  A transthoracic ultrasound takes only a few minutes to perform and is performed as a part of the E-FAST exam right in the trauma bay of the ER.  It costs nothing, is associated with no radiation exposure, and requires no transport of the patient.

Continue reading

Posted in Authors, Hospital Medicine Blog | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off

Family Medicine Enrollment Grow in 2012 – Still Room for Concern

According to the National Resident Matching Program (NRMP), also known as the Match, family medicine attracted more graduating medical students in 2012, marking an increase in the field for the third year in a row.

The Match data provided by the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) includes family medicine, family medicine-psychiatry, family medicine-emergency medicine, family medicine-preventive medicine and family medicine-internal medicine programs.

This year, family medicine residency programs filled 2,611 positions out of 2,764 positions offered, for a fill rate of 94.5 percent. However, this only a slight improvement over last year’s record-breaking rate of 94.4 percent.

A total of 1,335 U.S. seniors matched to family medicine in 2012 – an increase of only 18 seniors compared to last year. But for the first time since 2002, there were fewer participants in the NRMP: 16,527 in 2012 versus 16,559 in 2011.

Continue reading

Posted in Authors, Primary Care | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off

Daily Aspirin Decreases the Development of Cancer

Dr. Joseph Esherick Monthly Blog – March 2012

Dr. Peter Rothwell has extensively studied the benefits of daily aspirin on cancer incidence, mortality, and the risk of metastasis.  He has just published three articles in Lancet this month that demonstrates a significant reduction in cancer incidence, cancer-related deaths and the risk of cancer metastases with daily aspirin. [1,2,3]

These 3 reports compliment his previous work which demonstrated that the daily ingestion of at least 75 mg of aspirin for at least 5 years decreased the risk of cancer-related mortality. [4]   In this study, he analyzed over 25,000 patients in eight randomized trials and found that there was a statistically significant decreased risk of death from cancer with the daily ingestion of aspirin for at least 5 years (OR 0.79, p = 0.003).  The benefit was seen in esophageal adenocarcinoma, lung adenocarcinoma, pancreatic cancer, brain cancer, gastric cancer, breast cancer, biliary cancer, and colorectal cancer.  The benefit appeared to increase with the duration of aspirin treatment and appeared to be effective regardless of sex and smoking status.  The greatest benefit was seen among adenocarcinomas (HR 0.66).

The recent studies analyzed data from 51 randomized controlled trials involving over 69,000 patients.  The results revealed a decreased cancer incidence after 3 years of aspirin usage (OR 0.76, p = 0.003) that applied to both men and women.  Although aspirin use decreased the incidence of many types of cancer, the benefit was greatest among gastrointestinal cancers (OR 0.62, p<0.001).  The analysis also revealed a significant decrease in distant metastases among aspirin users (OR 0.64, p=0.001).  As was seen in cancer incidence, the effect on distant metastases was greatest in adenocarcinomas (HR 0.54, p=0.0007) versus other solid cancers (HR 0.82, p=0.39).  It is postulated that the decrease in cancer-related deaths may be due to the prevention of distant metastases.

We already know that daily aspirin is beneficial for primary cardiovascular prevention if the 10-year risk of significant coronary artery disease is at least 10%.  This data gives us another reason to recommend daily aspirin use, especially in our patients who have a strong family history of cancer.

________________________________________________________________

Joseph Esherick, MD, FAAFP is the Associate Director of Medicine and the Medical ICU Director at the Ventura County Medical Center in Ventura, California.  He is also an Associate Clinical Professor of Family Medicine at The David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA. He received his medical degree from Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, and completed a family practice residency at the Ventura County Medical Center, Ventura, California. He is board certified in family medicine and the author of the Tarascon Primary Care Pocketbook and the Tarascon Hospital Medicine Pocketbook. He is one of the lead instructors of the Hospitalist and Emergency Procedures Courses for Hospital Procedures Consultants. He is also an editorial board member for Tarascon Publishing and for Elsevier’s First Consult.

Dr. Esherick is the author of some of Tarascon Publishing’s best-selling titles including:
Tarascon Medical Procedures PocketbookTarascon Hospital Medicine Pocketbookand Tarascon Primary Care Pocketbook. Hospital Medicine and Primary Care are also available for mobile (iPhone, Android and Blackberry).

________________________________________________________________

[1] Rothwell PM et al. Short-term effects of daily aspirin on cancer incidence, mortality, and non-vascular death: analysis of the time course of risks and benefits in 51 randomized controlled trials. The Lancet, March 21, 2012. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61720-0
[2] Rothwell PM et al. Effects of regular aspirin on long-term cancer incidence and metastasis: a systematic comparison of evidence from observational studies versus randomized trials. Lancet Oncology, March 21, 2012. Doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70112-2
[3] Rothwell PM et al. Effect of daily aspirin on risk of cancer metastasis: a study of incident cancers during randomized controlled trials. Lancet, March 21, 2012. Doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60209-8.  [4] Rothwell PM et al. Effect of daily aspirin on long-term risk of death due to cancer: analysis of individual patient data from randomized trials. Lancet, 2011; 377 (9759): 31-41.
Posted in Authors, Hospital Medicine Blog | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off

Simulation-Based Procedural Training Improves Job & Patient Satisfaction

Dr. Joseph Esherick Monthly Blog – February 2012

Are you a hospitalist who would like to incorporate procedures into your practice but don’t feel competent or confident in your skills?  Are you a hospitalist who does procedures so infrequently that you feel more comfortable referring your patients to a specialist for such procedures?  Are you a hospitalist who believes that you can get better reimbursement seeing more inpatients rather than incorporating hospital procedures into your practice?  Are you a hospitalist who believes that doing procedures will decrease your job satisfaction?  These are a few of many scenarios and myths that prevent hospitalists from performing bedside procedures.

Hospitalists who perform procedures enjoy their jobs more than those who do not.   In one Canadian study of over 19,000 physicians, the degree of job satisfaction was directly linked to the range of procedures performed by the physician.[1]

Additionally, patients feel better when the bedside procedures are performed by their primary physician with whom they have developed a rapport.  There are a few reasons for this.  Frequently, procedures performed by a specialist, especially an interventional radiologist, require that the patient has long waits, is taken away from their room, their nurse, and their family.  Furthermore, patients have often developed a relationship and trust with their primary inpatient physician and feel more comfort when they are performing the procedure rather than a complete stranger.
Continue reading

Posted in Hospital Medicine Blog, Primary Care | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Join Million Hearts in the Fight Against Heart Attacks This February

Just in time for American Heart Month, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), launched its national initiative aimed to prevent 1 million heart attacks and strokes in the U.S. over the next five years. The campaign is called Million Hearts™ and is co-led by CDC and the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), integrating and amplifying a range of existing heart disease and stroke prevention programs, policies, and activities.

The Million Hearts™ Initiative seeks to prevent 1 million heart attacks and strokes by the end of 2016 by:

Empowering Americans to make healthy choices such as avoiding tobacco use and reducing the amount of sodium and trans fat they eat. These changes will reduce the number of people who need medical treatment for high blood pressure or cholesterol—and ultimately prevent heart attacks and strokes.

Improving care for people who do need treatment by encouraging a focus on the “ABCS”—Aspirin for people at risk, Blood pressure control, Cholesterol management, and Smoking cessation—four steps to address the major risk factors for cardiovascular disease and help to prevent heart attacks and strokes.

“Heart disease takes the lives of far too many people in this country, depriving their families and communities of someone they love and care for—a father, a mother, a wife, a friend, a neighbor, a spouse. With more than 2 million heart attacks and strokes a year, and 800,000 deaths, just about all of us have been touched by someone who has had heart disease, heart attack, or a stroke.” - Kathleen Sebelius, Department of Health and Human Services Secretary

As a Health Care Provider, How can you be One in a Million Hearts™?

TREAT high blood pressure and cholesterol in your patients.

TREAT appropriate patients with Aspirin.

ESTABALISH and DISCUSS with patients their specific goals for treatment and the most effective ways that they can help control their risk factors for heart disease and stroke.

COACH your patients to develop heart-healthy habits, such as regular exercise and a diet rich in fresh fruits and vegetables, and stress reduction techniques. Provide tools to show their progress and access to team members to help them succeed.

ASK your patients about their smoking status and provide cessation support and medication when appropriate.

ASK about barriers to medication adherence and help find solutions.

USE health information technology, such as electronic health records and decision support tools, to improve the delivery of care and control of the ABCS.

To learn more about Million Hearts™ and take the pledge to help prevent 1 million heart attacks, please visit the Million Hearts™ campaign website.

Posted in Cardiology | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off

Beta-Blockers: Beneficial For Older Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease?

Dr. Joseph Esherick Monthly Blog – January 2012

When I was in medical school in the early 1990’s, one of the principles that I learned was to never prescribe beta-blockers to patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).  We knew that stimulation of beta-2 receptors caused bronchodilation and therefore the belief was that beta-blockers would cause bronchospasm and lead to COPD exacerbations.  This practice was analyzed in a Cochrane review by Salpeter et al. in 2005 which concluded that, “cardioselective beta-blockers, given to patients with COPD do not produce a significant short-term reduction in airway function or in the incidence of COPD exacerbations. “[1] Another study focusing on the treatment of systemic hypertension in patients with pulmonary disease also concluded that cardioselective beta-blockers (β1-selective antagonists) were safe to use in patients with stable COPD.[2] One final review of the available evidence came to the same conclusion that, “the use of cardioselective beta-blocker therapy in patients with cardiovascular disease and comorbid COPD [appears safe].”[3]

These previous reviews attested to the safety of beta-blocker therapy in patients with stable, mild-moderate COPD.  However, a recent study analyzed the question whether beta-blockers in patients with COPD are beneficial if there is an indication for their use?[4]

Continue reading

Posted in Authors, Cardiology, Hospital Medicine Blog | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off